Table of Contents
Summary: Special theme for this edition: Domains of Natural Argument. There were
13 papers submitted for peer-review to this workshop. Out of these,
12 papers were accepted for this volume,
8 as regular papers and
4 as short papers.
Programme Committee
Giulia D'Agostino - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Switzerland
Reva Freedman - Northern Illinois University, US
Yuanxi Fu - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , US
Stella Heras - Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain
Helmut Horacek - German Research Centre for AI, Germany
Loris Isabettini - University of Windsor, Canada
Mare Koit - University of Tartu, Estonia
Jack Mumford - University of Liverpool, UK
Elena Musi - University of Liverpool, UK
Rudi Palmieri - University of Liverpool, UK
Andrea Pazienza - A3K Srl & NTT DATA SpA, Italy
Paul Piwek - The Open University, UK
Antonio Rago - Imperial College London, UK
Ramon Ruiz Dolz - University of Dundee, UK
Patrick Saint-Dizier - IRIT-CNRS, France
Guillermo R. Simari - Universidad del Sur in Bahia Blanca, Argentina
Mark Snaith - Robert Gordon University Aberdeen, UK
Tommy Yuan - University of York, UK
Heng Zheng - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, US
Accepted Papers
-
Enhancing Essay Argument Persuasiveness Prediction Using a RoBERTa-LSTM Hybrid Model
1-6
Fahad M Alzaidee,
Tommy Yuan,
Peter Nightingale,
Khaled El Ebyary
-
Analysing Language of the Dynamics of Ethos and Emotions in Rephrased Arguments
7-17
Katarzyna Budzynska,
Marcin Koszowy,
Patrick Saint-Dizier,
Maciej Uberna
-
Argumentative Patterns in the Context of Dialogical Exchanges in the Financial Domain
18-29
Giulia D'Agostino,
Andrea Rocci
-
Argumentation Interfaces to Facilitate Human-Machine Collaboration in Scientific Research: A Preliminary Exploration
30-35
Yuanxi Fu,
Jodi Schneider
-
Modeling Biochemistry Arguments
36-45
Nancy L. Green,
Derek T. McLachlin,
Robert E. Mercer
-
Detecting Disinformation through Computational Argumentation Techniques and Large Language Models
46-51
Ana Gutiérrez,
Stella Heras,
Javier Palanca
-
Modelling Natural Argumentation in Education: Bridging Traditional Frameworks and Modern Multimodal Approaches
52-58
Loris Isabettini
-
The Fallacy of Explainable Generative AI: Evidence from Argumentative Prompting in two Domains
59-69
Elena Musi,
Rudi Palmieri
-
Predicting Human Judgement in Online Debates with Argumentation
70-80
Beauty Oluokun,
Guilherme Paulino-Passos,
Antonio Rago,
Francesca Toni
-
From Loci to Critical Questions: an AMT Approach to Argument Evaluation. Insights from the Domain of Corporate Controversies
81-89
Rudi Palmieri
-
Arguments Based on Domain Rules in Prediction Justifications
90-99
Joeri Peters,
Floris Bex,
Henry Prakken
-
On Evaluating Legal-Reasoning Capabilities of Generative AI
100-112
Henry Prakken