| Vol-1341 urn:nbn:de:0074-1341-7 Copyright © 2014 for the individual papers by the papers' authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes. This volume is published and copyrighted by its editors.

# ArgNLP 2014
Frontiers and Connections between Argumentation Theory and Natural Language Processing

### Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers and Connections between Argumentation Theory and Natural Language Processing

### Forlì-Cesena, Italy, July 21-25, 2014.

Edited by

### Elena Cabrio *
Serena Villata *
Adam Wyner **

* INRIA, Sophia Antipolis, France
** The University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

## Table of Contents

- Preface
  Elena Cabrio, Serena Villata, Adam Wyner

### Papers

- Argumentation for Scientific Claims in a Biomedical Research Article
  Nancy Green
- Counter-Argumentation and Discourse: A Case Study
  Stergos Afantenos, Nicholas Asher
- Applying Argument Extraction to Improve Legal Information Retrieval
  Kevin Ashley
- Argumentation Mining on the Web from Information Seeking Perspective
  Ivan Habernal, Judith Eckle-Kohler, Iryna Gurevych
- Argumentation Mining in Persuasive Essays and Scientific Articles from the Discourse Structure Perspective
  Christian Stab, Christian Kirschner, Judith Eckle-Kohler, Iryna Gurevych
- Argumentation, Ideology, and Issue Framing in Parliamentary Discourse
  Graeme Hirst, Vanessa Wei Feng, Christopher Cochrane, Nona Naderi
- Argumentation Theory in the Field: An Empirical Study of Fundamental Notions
  Ariel Rosenfeld, Sarit Kraus
- Legal Argumentation Concerning Almost Identical Expressions (AIE) In Statutory Texts
  Michał Araszkiewicz, Agata Łopatkiewicz
- Extracting and Understanding Arguments about Motives from Stories
  Floris Bex, Trevor Bench-Capon
- Encompassing Uncertainty in Argumentation Schemes
  Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin, Beishui Liao, Leon van der Torre
- An Informatics Perspective on Argumentation Mining
  Jodi Schneider
- Mining Fine-grained Argument Elements
  Adam Wyner
- Genre Distinctions and Discourse Modes: Text Types Differ in their Situation Type Distributions
  Alexis Palmer, Annemarie Friedrich
- Scientific Argumentation Detection as Limited-domain Intention Recognition
  Simone Teufel

The whole proceedings can also be downloaded as a single file ( PDF ).

2015-03-13: submitted by Serena Villata and Monica Palmirani, metadata incl. bibliographic data published under Creative Commons CC0
2015-03-14: published on CEUR-WS.org |valid HTML5|